In re MaGill

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re MaGill

2014 VT 47, 98 A.3d 16, 196 Vt. 638, 2014 Vt. LEXIS 47

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 12-449·Published

Opinion

¶ 1. Respondent William MaGill has filed with the Court an affidavit of resignation supported by a statement of facts from disciplinary counsel. Respondent’s resignation from the bar is accepted, and we order, pursuant to A.O. 9, Rule 19.C, that William MaGill is disbarred on consent from the office of attorney and counselor at law, effective from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with the requirements of A.O. 9, Rule 23.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1. Respondent William MaGill has filed with the Court an affidavit of resignation supported by a statement of facts from disciplinary counsel. Respondent’s resignation from the bar is accepted, and we order, pursuant to A.O. 9, Rule 19.C, that William MaGill is disbarred on consent from the office of attorney and counselor at law, effective from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with the requirements of A.O. 9, Rule 23.

In re MaGill, 2014 VT 47, 98 A.3d 16, 196 Vt. 638, 2014 Vt. LEXIS 47 (Vt. 2014).

Pincite

2014 VT 47 (In re MaGill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.