In re Magena J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Magena J.

152 A.D.3d 593, 56 N.Y.S.3d 871

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 2017·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the father from an intake order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ben Darvil, Jr., J.), dated April 5, 2016. The intake order, insofar as appealed from, provided that “records, reports, photographs or other documents provided pursuant to this order, shall not be disclosed to counsel not assigned to this matter” and that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.”

Ordered that the intake order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The intake order, insofar as appealed from, must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Matter of Kaden J.M. (Quianna J.) (152 AD3d 604 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Balkin, J.R, Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the father from an intake order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ben Darvil, Jr., J.), dated April 5, 2016. The intake order, insofar as appealed from, provided that “records, reports, photographs or other documents provided pursuant to this order, shall not be disclosed to counsel not assigned to this matter” and that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.”

Ordered that the intake order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The intake order, insofar as appealed from, must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Matter of Kaden J.M. (Quianna J.) (152 AD3d 604 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Balkin, J.R, Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

In re Magena J., 152 A.D.3d 593, 56 N.Y.S.3d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

152 A.D.3d 593 (In re Magena J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related