In re Magena J.
This text of 152 A.D.3d 593 (In re Magena J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the father from an intake order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ben Darvil, Jr., J.), dated April 5, 2016. The intake order, insofar as appealed from, provided that “records, reports, photographs or other documents provided pursuant to this order, shall not be disclosed to counsel not assigned to this matter” and that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.”
Ordered that the intake order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The intake order, insofar as appealed from, must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Matter of Kaden J.M. (Quianna J.) (152 AD3d 604 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A.D.3d 593, 56 N.Y.S.3d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-magena-j-nyappdiv-2017.