in Re Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 2011·No. 01-11-00373-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 13, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00373-CV

———————————

IN RE Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

          Relators, Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s (1) order granting “Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Deposition on Written Questions of Facebook, Inc. and Myspace, Inc.” and (2) oral ruling denying relators’ motion to compel the continuation of Cody Karl’s deposition. 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.



[1]           The underlying case is Cody Karl v. Magellan Midstream Partners, LP, Houston Mooring Company, Inc., G&H Towing Company, Southwest Wire Rope, LP, Seatrout GmbH & Co KG, and Tanker Shipping GmbH, No. 2008-74209, in the 125th District Court, the Honorable Kyle Carter presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC (in Re Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.