In re Magee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Magee

850 A.2d 1249, 180 N.J. 302, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 707

DecidedJune 30, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 850 A.2d 1249 (In re Magee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Magee, 850 A.2d 1249, 180 N.J. 302, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 707 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-360, concluding that as matter of final disci[303]*303pline pursuant to Rule l:20-13(c), MARK E. MAGEE of SHREWSBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded based on his guilty plea to one count of third-degree eluding a police officer in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2(b), one count of third-degree resisting arrest, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2(a), and driving while intoxicated, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4r-50, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK E. MAGEE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-360, concluding that as matter of final disci[303]*303pline pursuant to Rule l:20-13(c), MARK E. MAGEE of SHREWSBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded based on his guilty plea to one count of third-degree eluding a police officer in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2(b), one count of third-degree resisting arrest, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2(a), and driving while intoxicated, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4r-50, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK E. MAGEE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 A.2d 1249, 180 N.J. 302, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-magee-nj-2004.