In re Magasis

Third Circuit

In re Magasis

151 F.2d 802

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 15, 1945·No. Nos. 8983-8985·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these three cases the district court denied the petitioners’ applications for writs of habeas corpus. The applications allege facts similar to those disclosed in the case of United States ex rel. Samuels v. Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 801. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case it is clear that the facts alleged in these applications entitle the petitioners to the issuance of writs and hearings thereon.

Accordingly in each case the order of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to award a writ of habeas corpus as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these three cases the district court denied the petitioners’ applications for writs of habeas corpus. The applications allege facts similar to those disclosed in the case of United States ex rel. Samuels v. Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 801. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case it is clear that the facts alleged in these applications entitle the petitioners to the issuance of writs and hearings thereon.

Accordingly in each case the order of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to award a writ of habeas corpus as prayed for.

In re Magasis, 151 F.2d 802 (3d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

151 F.2d 802 (In re Magasis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related