In re Maeghan Mc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Maeghan Mc.

23 A.D.3d 389, 803 N.Y.S.2d 443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.3d 389 (In re Maeghan Mc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Maeghan Mc., 23 A.D.3d 389, 803 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the parents appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J), dated May 11, 2004, as, after a hearing, found the subject child to be educationally neglected.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing educational neglect by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Nicole A., 305 AD2d 1039 [2003]; Matter of Fatima A., 276 AD2d 791 [2000]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the parents appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J), dated May 11, 2004, as, after a hearing, found the subject child to be educationally neglected.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing educational neglect by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Nicole A., 305 AD2d 1039 [2003]; Matter of Fatima A., 276 AD2d 791 [2000]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.3d 389, 803 N.Y.S.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maeghan-mc-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack