Home/Supreme Court/In re Madura

In re Madura

137 S. Ct. 88, 196 L. Ed. 2d 205, 85 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2016 WL 3018622, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4992
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2016
DocketNo. 15–9506.
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S. Ct. 88 (In re Madura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Madura, 137 S. Ct. 88, 196 L. Ed. 2d 205, 85 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2016 WL 3018622, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4992 (U.S. 2016).

Opinion

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioners have repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioners unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 88, 196 L. Ed. 2d 205, 85 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2016 WL 3018622, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-madura-scotus-2016.