In Re Madilene G. R. - Concur

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided January 10, 2013·No. M2012-01178-COA-R3-PT·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

November 27, 2012 Session

IN RE MADILENE G. R.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 11CV-579 Robert E. Corlew, III, Judge

No. M2012-01178-COA-R3-PT - Filed January 10, 2013

P ATRICIA J. C OTTRELL, P.J., M.S., concurring opinion.

OPINION

I concur in the reversal of the trial court’s termination of Father’s parental rights.

However, it is my opinion that the Guardians failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Father willfully failed to support the child in the four months prior to the filing of the petition. The evidence set out in the majority opinion does not, in my opinion, meet the Constitutionally required standard.

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Madilene G. R. - Concur, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).

In Re Madilene G. R. - Concur (In Re Madilene G. R. - Concur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.