in Re Madhavan Pisharodi
This text of in Re Madhavan Pisharodi (in Re Madhavan Pisharodi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00118-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE MADHAVAN PISHARODI, M.D.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Relator, Madhavan Pisharodi, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the
above cause on February 21, 2014, contending that the trial court erred in denying
relator’s motion to dismiss and plea to the jurisdiction. The Court requests that the real
parties in interest, Torbury Limited Partnership, TW & Associates, LTD, Paul Lenz, Vickie
Miles Rodriguez, Richard Slaydon, Chi D. Nguyen, M.D., Carlos Rosas, M.D., Chruma
Partnership, LP, and Umang Khetarpal, M.D., or any others whose interest would be
directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 24th day of February, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Madhavan Pisharodi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-madhavan-pisharodi-texapp-2014.