In Re MacMartin's Estate

242 N.W. 768, 258 Mich. 403
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 1932
DocketDocket No. 148, Calendar No. 36,470.
StatusPublished

This text of 242 N.W. 768 (In Re MacMartin's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re MacMartin's Estate, 242 N.W. 768, 258 Mich. 403 (Mich. 1932).

Opinion

This is appeal from allowance of claim for services rendered by plaintiff, an aged man, to John MacMartin, now deceased.

The question is of sufficiency of evidence to take the case to the jury.

MacMartin requested plaintiff to come to his farm as he wanted and needed him. Plaintiff did farm work and housework for over three years and claims for it one dollar a day, which the jury allowed.

There is testimony that MacMartin said to plaintiff that he could collect one dollar a day, and, "If I didn't want to pay you, I wouldn't keep you," and, "I am not going to pay you, I am going to keep your money and give it to you in a bunch so it will do you some good."

This and other like evidence, together with that of circumstances of the parties, made the issue of whether the services were rendered with expectation of pay and with expectation to pay. In re Hamlin's Estate, 223 Mich. 156; In reKnox's Estate, 220 Mich. 469.

The verdict is easily within the evidence. No other question requires discussion. Affirmed.

McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. *Page 405

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobs v. Knox
190 N.W. 238 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1922)
In re Hamlin's Estate
193 N.W. 833 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 N.W. 768, 258 Mich. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-macmartins-estate-mich-1932.