In re Mack

590 F. App'x 225
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2015·No. No. 14-1696·Published

Opinion

[226] Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the magistrate judge has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the magistrate judge to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge has issued a recommendation that Mack’s § 2255 motion be denied. Accordingly, because the magistrate judge has recently acted in Mack’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mack, 590 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2015).

590 F. App'x 225 (In re Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related