In re Mack
This text of 590 F. App'x 225 (In re Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[226]*226Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bennie A. Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the magistrate judge has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the magistrate judge to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge has issued a recommendation that Mack’s § 2255 motion be denied. Accordingly, because the magistrate judge has recently acted in Mack’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
590 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mack-ca4-2015.