In re Macias

579 A.2d 814, 121 N.J. 243, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1585
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1990·Published

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that SIXTO L. MACIAS of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1980, be publicly reprimanded for his failure to answer an ethics complaint, in violation of Rule 1:20—3(i), and for his failure to cooperate with the Office of Attorney Ethics, in violation of RPC 8.1(b),

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted, and SIXTO L. MACIAS is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board and the complete record in this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Macias, 579 A.2d 814, 121 N.J. 243, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1585 (N.J. 1990).

579 A.2d 814 (In re Macias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.