In re: Mace
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1178
In Re: PHILLIP MACE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:08-cv-03216-DKC)
Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 7, 2010
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mace, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mace petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
granted Mace’s motion on April 12, 2010. Accordingly, because
the district court has recently decided Mace’s case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: Mace (In re: Mace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.