In re: Mace

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 7, 2010·No. 10-1178·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1178

In Re: PHILLIP MACE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:08-cv-03216-DKC)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 7, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Mace, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip Mace petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act. Our review of

the district court’s docket reveals that the district court

granted Mace’s motion on April 12, 2010. Accordingly, because

the district court has recently decided Mace’s case, we deny the

mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Mace, (4th Cir. 2010).

In re: Mace (In re: Mace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related