In re MacDougall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re MacDougall

244 A.D. 747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D. 747 (In re MacDougall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re MacDougall, 244 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and respondent’s motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The Special Term was without power to amend the final decree by increasing the award to the respondent. (Matter of City of New York [Northern Blvd.], 242 App. Div. 839; Matter of City of New York [Dickens Ave.], 238 id. 850; affd., 262 N. Y. 699.) Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and respondent’s motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The Special Term was without power to amend the final decree by increasing the award to the respondent. (Matter of City of New York [Northern Blvd.], 242 App. Div. 839; Matter of City of New York [Dickens Ave.], 238 id. 850; affd., 262 N. Y. 699.) Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-macdougall-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack