In Re MacDonnell's Estate

55 P.2d 834, 56 Nev. 504, 1936 Nev. LEXIS 17
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1936·No. No. 3130·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

It is ordered that a rehearing be granted in the above-entitled matter as to the claim of Ross Burke Co. only.

It is further ordered that upon the argument on rehearing counsel discuss the effect of the failure of appellants to urge estoppel in the lower court, in view of the rule in Paterson v. Condos, 55 Nev. 260, 30 P.2d 383, and also the question of how the conduct of the widow, even if sufficient to estop her, can affect the matter in view of the existence of a minor child. *Page 505

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re MacDonnell's Estate, 55 P.2d 834, 56 Nev. 504, 1936 Nev. LEXIS 17 (Neb. 1936).

55 P.2d 834 (In Re MacDonnell's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nevada State Bank v. Jamison Family Partnership
801 P.2d 1377 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
Zunino v. Paramore
435 P.2d 196 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)