in Re: Maale, Dr. Gerhard E.
This text of in Re: Maale, Dr. Gerhard E. (in Re: Maale, Dr. Gerhard E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion and Order issued January 25, 1999
In The
(Htfitrt nf Appeals JTtfty Ststrtrt of Okxas at iallas No. 05-99-00114-CV
IN RE DR. GERHARD E. MAALE, Relator
FROM THE 95th DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 98-01054-D
OPINION AND ORDER
Before Justices Ovard, Whittington, and Bridges
Relator has filed apetition for writ of mandamus and amotion to stay all trial court proceedings. Relator contends avisiting judge, assigned to hear recusal motions against the trial judge, erred in denying an objection to him under Government Code section 74.053. The record does not contain such an order signed by the visiting judge. Accordingly, relator's motion for temporary stay and petition for writ of mandamus are
DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j)(l)(A).
\K WHITTINGTON T JUSTICE
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Maale, Dr. Gerhard E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maale-dr-gerhard-e-texapp-1999.