in Re M & M Orthodontics, PA
This text of in Re M & M Orthodontics, PA (in Re M & M Orthodontics, PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00084-CV
In re M&M Orthodontics, PA
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Real parties in interest Christine Ellis; Texas Health and Human Services Commission
(HHSC); Dr. Kyle Janek, in his Official Capacity; and the Office of the Inspector General have filed
an unopposed motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. The real
parties in interest have advised the Court that the underlying administrative action that was pending
against relator M&M Orthodontics in the HHSC Appeals Division has been nonsuited and
dismissed, rendering moot the issues raised by M&M Orthodontics in its petition for writ of
mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
Filed: January 30, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re M & M Orthodontics, PA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-m-m-orthodontics-pa-texapp-2015.