In re M. Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re M. Children

286 A.D.2d 736, 730 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 736 (In re M. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re M. Children, 286 A.D.2d 736, 730 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.), dated January 19, 1999, which denied the application of John E. M. for a copy of the case file from the petitioner free of charge, without prejudice to renewal upon providing the court with complete copies of his tax returns for the three years prior to his application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[737]*737We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Jacque Dominic J., 264 AD2d 845; Matter of H. Children, 232 AD2d 560; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.), dated January 19, 1999, which denied the application of John E. M. for a copy of the case file from the petitioner free of charge, without prejudice to renewal upon providing the court with complete copies of his tax returns for the three years prior to his application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[737]*737We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Jacque Dominic J., 264 AD2d 845; Matter of H. Children, 232 AD2d 560; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 736, 730 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-m-children-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack