In re Lynne C.

40 A.D.3d 469, 836 N.Y.S.2d 176

This text of 40 A.D.3d 469 (In re Lynne C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lynne C., 40 A.D.3d 469, 836 N.Y.S.2d 176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2006, which, upon a finding of abandonment, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights respecting the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence that respondent mother failed to visit or communicate with the child or contact the agency for a period of six months prior to the filing of the petition raised a presumption of abandonment, which respondent failed to rebut (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]; Matter of Stefanie Judith N., 27 AD3d 403 [2006]). Contrary to respondent’s appellate arguments, a showing of diligent efforts to encourage respondent’s parental relationship with the child was not essential to petitioner’s prima facie case (see Social Services Law § 384-b [5] [b]; Matter of Calvin Raheem Q., 287 AD2d 274 [2001]); rather, once petitioner demonstrated abandonment, it was respondent’s burden to show that there were circumstances rendering contact with the child or agency infeasible, or to show that the agency discouraged her from contacting the child (see Matter of Stefanie Judith N., 27 AD3d at 403). Respondent, however, did not meet that burden. The court properly concluded that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate respondent’s parental rights so as to facilitate the child’s adoption. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Judith N.
27 A.D.3d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Calvin Raheem Q.
287 A.D.2d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 469, 836 N.Y.S.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lynne-c-nyappdiv-2007.