In Re Lyles v. State
This text of 342 So. 2d 416 (In Re Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After careful consideration, we have concluded that this petition must be denied. We do not approve the language of the Court of Criminal Appeals in its opinion, 342 So.2d 414, wherein it is stated that: “The admissibility of such evidence is not addressed to the discretion of the court because of its relevancy to the issue.” This language does not follow the rule on the admissibility of intention, motive or other unexpressed mental state as expressed in [417]*417our opinion in Starr v. Starr, 293 Ala. 204, 301 So.2d 78 (1974).
ViRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 So. 2d 416, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lyles-v-state-ala-1977.