In Re Lyles v. State

342 So. 2d 416, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1998
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 21, 1977
DocketSC 2276
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 So. 2d 416 (In Re Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Lyles v. State, 342 So. 2d 416, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1998 (Ala. 1977).

Opinion

BEATTY, Justice.

After careful consideration, we have concluded that this petition must be denied. We do not approve the language of the Court of Criminal Appeals in its opinion, 342 So.2d 414, wherein it is stated that: “The admissibility of such evidence is not addressed to the discretion of the court because of its relevancy to the issue.” This language does not follow the rule on the admissibility of intention, motive or other unexpressed mental state as expressed in [417]*417our opinion in Starr v. Starr, 293 Ala. 204, 301 So.2d 78 (1974).

ViRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and SHORES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mullins v. State
359 So. 2d 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 So. 2d 416, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lyles-v-state-ala-1977.