In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00079-CV
IN RE LYFT, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01321-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Nowell Relator’s January 24, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial
court’s order requiring relator to produce information regarding excess insurance
policies without a confidentiality designation. Entitlement to mandamus relief
requires relator to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and
that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition, the record, and the amicus filings before us, we
conclude that relator has failed to show that the trial court clearly abused its
discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
230079F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.