In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 2023·No. 05-23-00079-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00079-CV

IN RE LYFT, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01321-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Nowell Relator’s January 24, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial

court’s order requiring relator to produce information regarding excess insurance

policies without a confidentiality designation. Entitlement to mandamus relief

requires relator to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and

that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition, the record, and the amicus filings before us, we

conclude that relator has failed to show that the trial court clearly abused its

discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

230079F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re: Lyft, Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)