In re Luvara

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Luvara

834 A.2d 397, 178 N.J. 19

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedNovember 6, 2003

DocketATTORNEY NO. 003871989

StatusPublished

This text of 834 A.2d 397 (In re Luvara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Luvara, 834 A.2d 397, 178 N.J. 19 (N.J. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

DAVID F. LUVARA of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, having been temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed on October 15, 2001, pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(b)(1), based on respondent’s entry of a guilty plea in the Court of Common Pleas in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to a charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of 18 Pa. C.S.A. 903;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported that the Court of Common Pleas of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vacated respondent’s guilty plea and that respondent was reinstated to the practice of law in Pennsylvania on April 3, 2003;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that respondent is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

DAVID F. LUVARA of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, having been temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed on October 15, 2001, pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(b)(1), based on respondent’s entry of a guilty plea in the Court of Common Pleas in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to a charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of 18 Pa. C.S.A. 903;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported that the Court of Common Pleas of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vacated respondent’s guilty plea and that respondent was reinstated to the practice of law in Pennsylvania on April 3, 2003;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that respondent is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

834 A.2d 397, 178 N.J. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-luvara-nj-2003.