Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Lustig

In re Lustig

196 A.D.2d 184, 612 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3539
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1994·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on June 28, 1978 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he was admitted to practice law in the State of Colorado, has practiced law there since 1984, and seeks to resign because he can no longer justify paying the attorney registration fee. There are no complaints pending against him.

[185]*185We grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lustig, 196 A.D.2d 184, 612 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

196 A.D.2d 184 (In re Lustig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.