In re Lula XX.
667 N.E.2d 333, 88 N.Y.2d 842, 644 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1021
Opinion
[843] Motion for leave to appeal by appellant Lula XX. dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for leave to appeal by Mental Hygiene Legal Service dismissed upon the ground that Mental Hygiene Legal Service is not a party to this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Lula XX., 667 N.E.2d 333, 88 N.Y.2d 842, 644 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1021 (N.Y. 1996).
667 N.E.2d 333 (In re Lula XX.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maggio v. Doughtery
130 A.D.3d 1446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Paduano v. Boland
277 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Mason v. U.E.S.S. Leasing Corp.
274 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Madera v. New York City Housing Authority
264 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Carmen P. v. PS&S Realty Corp.
259 A.D.2d 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Kripke v. Benedictine Hospital
255 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Elm Shade Maintenance Corp. v. Elm Shade Estates, Inc.
246 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)