In re Luis A.

223 A.D.2d 505, 637 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 736
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of disposi[506]*506tion, Family Court, Bronx County (Rita Bolstad, J.), entered November 9, 1994, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent and conditionally discharged him for 12 months, following a fact-finding determination that respondent committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of menacing in the second degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the presentment agency, the evidence of respondent’s repeated acts of stalking, hitting, grabbing and threatening the complainant with physical harm could lead a rational person to infer that respondent intended to place complainant in reasonable fear of physical injury, and thereby was guilty of second degree menacing (Penal Law § 120.14 [2]; see, Matter of Moises O., 189 AD2d 687). That some of these acts occurred while respondent and the complainant were in a dating relationship does not require a finding to the contrary. There is nothing in the statute itself to indicate a legislative intent to immunize stalkers who target persons familiar to them. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Luis A., 223 A.D.2d 505, 637 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

223 A.D.2d 505 (In re Luis A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thompson
119 A.D.3d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. McCowan
45 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)