In re Luger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Luger

225 A.D.2d 236, 649 N.Y.2d 890, 649 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 236 (In re Luger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Luger, 225 A.D.2d 236, 649 N.Y.2d 890, 649 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on June 26, 1980, and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York because she no longer wishes to maintain her attorney registration in this State. She states in her affidavit that she relocated her residence and law practice to the State of Texas in 1983, has not practiced law in New York since that time, and has no [237]*237intention of returning to New York. There are no complaints pending against her.

We grant the application and direct that her name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on June 26, 1980, and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York because she no longer wishes to maintain her attorney registration in this State. She states in her affidavit that she relocated her residence and law practice to the State of Texas in 1983, has not practiced law in New York since that time, and has no [237]*237intention of returning to New York. There are no complaints pending against her.

We grant the application and direct that her name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 236, 649 N.Y.2d 890, 649 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-luger-nyappdiv-1996.