In re: Ludwig

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 20, 2026·No. SCPW-26-0000061·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 20-AUG-2026 10:49 AM Dkt. 10 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN RE JEFFREY GRANT LUDWIG

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 3CC181000036)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

(By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Johnson, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the petition for “supervisory relief/certiorari,” filed January 27, 2026, which we construe as a petition for extraordinary writ, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 20, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Ronald G. Johnson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ludwig, (haw 2026).

In re: Ludwig (In re: Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)