in Re: Lucious Ray Johnson
This text of in Re: Lucious Ray Johnson (in Re: Lucious Ray Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00134-CV
IN RE LUCIOUS RAY JOHNSON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On February 18, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator seeks to have this court compel the judge of the 228th District Court in Harris County to furnish him copies of his trial record so that he may prepare for the hearing on his application for post-conviction DNA testing. Appellant is represented by appointed counsel in his post-conviction proceeding. Relator has not established he requested the trial court to perform a nondiscretionary act and the court refused. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Lucious Ray Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lucious-ray-johnson-texapp-2004.