in Re Lowe's Companies, Inc.
This text of in Re Lowe's Companies, Inc. (in Re Lowe's Companies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00379-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On August 17, 2022, relator Lowe’s Companies, Inc. filed a petition for writ of
mandamus through which it asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing
to disqualify counsel for the real party in interest, Donna Kay Scott. Relator has further
filed an opposed motion for temporary relief and stay requesting that we stay the trial
court’s July 18, 2022 order denying relator’s motion for disqualification of counsel. This Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ opposed motion for
temporary relief and stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted as stated herein.
Accordingly, we grant the relators’ opposed motion for temporary relief and stay, and we
order the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending further order of this Court, or until
this case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). The Court requests that the real
party in interest, Scott, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief
sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of
ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 18th day of August, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lowe's Companies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowes-companies-inc-texapp-2022.