In re Lowenstein

S.D. New York

In re Lowenstein

106 F. 51, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedMay 1, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 106 F. 51 (In re Lowenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lowenstein, 106 F. 51, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge.

The bankrupt’s examination satisfies me that lie has not: dealt honestly, and has not meant to deal honestly by his creditors; that he knew the business at Lexington avenue was his own and not his wife’s; and that his statements as to assets in his schedules were untrue, and that he knew them to be untrue. I can give no encouragement to such practices because they are small, but must consider them equally fatal in large and small cases alike. Discharge refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, District Judge.

The bankrupt’s examination satisfies me that lie has not: dealt honestly, and has not meant to deal honestly by his creditors; that he knew the business at Lexington avenue was his own and not his wife’s; and that his statements as to assets in his schedules were untrue, and that he knew them to be untrue. I can give no encouragement to such practices because they are small, but must consider them equally fatal in large and small cases alike. Discharge refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 F. 51, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowenstein-nysd-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack