In re Lowenstein
106 F. 51, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7
Opinion
The bankrupt’s examination satisfies me that lie has not: dealt honestly, and has not meant to deal honestly by his creditors; that he knew the business at Lexington avenue was his own and not his wife’s; and that his statements as to assets in his schedules were untrue, and that he knew them to be untrue. I can give no encouragement to such practices because they are small, but must consider them equally fatal in large and small cases alike. Discharge refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Lowenstein, 106 F. 51, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).
106 F. 51 (In re Lowenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farmers' Savings Bank v. Anton
1 F.2d 103 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
Baylor v. Rawlings
200 F. 131 (Eighth Circuit, 1912)
In re Becker
106 F. 54 (N.D. New York, 1901)