In re Lowenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Lowenstein

918 A.2d 593, 190 N.J. 58, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 335

DecidedMarch 21, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 918 A.2d 593 (In re Lowenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lowenstein, 918 A.2d 593, 190 N.J. 58, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-254, concluding that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(2)(failing to disclose material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a fraudulent act by a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-254, concluding that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(2)(failing to disclose material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a fraudulent act by a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 A.2d 593, 190 N.J. 58, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowenstein-nj-2007.