in Re Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth A. Love

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 30, 2015
Docket13-15-00557-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth A. Love (in Re Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth A. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth A. Love, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00557-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE LOVE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., LOVE PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS, L.P., AND KENNETH A. LOVE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Relators, Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth

A. Love, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief in the above

cause on November 24, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel

the trial court to vacate its November 23, 2015 order denying relators’ motion to compel

the depositions of John Spellmann, individually and as executor of the estate of Velma

Spellmann, Gerald Lewis Sheehan Jr., Jane Lynn Sheehan Michaels, and Lorene H.

Koopmann. Through their emergency motion, relators seek to stay litigation and the trial

of this matter that is currently set for December 7, 2015. Real parties in interest John Spellmann, individually and as executor of the estate of Velma Spellmann, Gerald Lewis

Sheehan Jr., Jane Lynn Sheehan Michaels, Ralph Koopmann, and Karen M. Koenig have

filed a response and objection to relators’ emergency motion for stay.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief

and the response and objection thereto, is of the opinion that the motion should be

granted. The motion for emergency relief is hereby GRANTED and the trial court

proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is

finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order

granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”).

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, or any others whose interest

would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R.

52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 30th day of November, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Love Enterprises, L.L.C., Love Partnership Interests, L.P., and Kenneth A. Love, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-love-enterprises-llc-love-partnership-interests-lp-and-texapp-2015.