In re Louis P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Louis P.

304 A.D.2d 501, 757 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 501 (In re Louis P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Louis P., 304 A.D.2d 501, 757 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about December 15, 2000, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 6V2 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After weighing all the pertinent factors (see Matter of Benjamin L., 92 NY2d 660 [1999]), we conclude that appellant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We find that the presentment agency provided a reasonable excuse for its TVa-month delay in filing the petition, and that appellant was not prejudiced in any manner. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about December 15, 2000, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 6V2 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After weighing all the pertinent factors (see Matter of Benjamin L., 92 NY2d 660 [1999]), we conclude that appellant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We find that the presentment agency provided a reasonable excuse for its TVa-month delay in filing the petition, and that appellant was not prejudiced in any manner. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 501, 757 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-louis-p-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack