In re Lorillard
108 F. 591, 47 C.C.A. 511, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3799
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Lorillard. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 F. 677 →
Opinion
The points suggested were not overlooked by the court, as may be inferred from a perusal of the opinion. The contention of the appellant is not only highly technical, but un-meritorious and inequitable. Petition for rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Lorillard, 108 F. 591, 47 C.C.A. 511, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3799 (2d Cir. 1901).
108 F. 591 (In re Lorillard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.