in Re Loretta Young Cantu

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2016
Docket13-16-00632-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Loretta Young Cantu (in Re Loretta Young Cantu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Loretta Young Cantu, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00632-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE LORETTA YOUNG CANTU

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Per Curiam Order

Relator, Loretta Young Cantu, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for

emergency temporary stay in the above cause on November 21, 2016. Through this

original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to set aside an order setting a

motion for summary judgment for hearing on grounds that the order is void because the

trial court lacks jurisdiction. Through her motion for emergency temporary stay, relator

seeks to stay the proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of this original

proceeding. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief,

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion for emergency relief is

GRANTED and the trial court hearing set for November 30, 2016 and other trial court

proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is

finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order

granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”).

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Rolando Cantu, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this

order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 21st day of November, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Loretta Young Cantu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-loretta-young-cantu-texapp-2016.