In re Loos

116 Ohio St. 3d 287
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 2007·No. No. 2006-1724·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, on the authority of In re C.S., 115 Ohio St.3d 267, 2007-Ohio-4919, 874 N.E.2d 1177, to the extent that the court of appeals found that there was a valid waiver, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court to consider the waiver issue in light of the totality-of-the-circumstances test set forth in In re C.S.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in In re C.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Loos, 116 Ohio St. 3d 287 (Ohio 2007).

116 Ohio St. 3d 287 (In re Loos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re C.S.
874 N.E.2d 1177 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)