in Re Lonnie Kade Welsh, Relator
This text of in Re Lonnie Kade Welsh, Relator (in Re Lonnie Kade Welsh, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-18-00411-CV
IN RE LONNIE KADE WELSH, RELATOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
January 3, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
We denied the petition for writ of mandamus of relator Lonnie Kade Welsh due to
his failure to comply with appellate rule 52.3 and Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and
Remedies Code. Subsequent to our opinion, Welsh filed an affidavit of indigence and a
certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. We construe the filings as a motion
for rehearing. Because Welsh has not cured the petition’s deficiencies and has not
complied with Chapter 14 by filing an affidavit describing his previous filings, we deny the
motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3; TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004 (West
2017).
Brian Quinn Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lonnie Kade Welsh, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lonnie-kade-welsh-relator-texapp-2019.