In Re Longoria

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Longoria

177 S.W.3d 25, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 339, 2005 WL 90987

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 13, 2005

Docket01-04-01272-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.W.3d 25 (In Re Longoria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Longoria, 177 S.W.3d 25, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 339, 2005 WL 90987 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*26 OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge York 1 has abused his discretion by vacating his order granting nonsuit without prejudice on October 29, 2004 in trial court cause no. 1996-55808.

The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus.

1

. The Honorable James York, judge of the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*26 OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge York 1 has abused his discretion by vacating his order granting nonsuit without prejudice on October 29, 2004 in trial court cause no. 1996-55808.

The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus.

1

. The Honorable James York, judge of the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.W.3d 25, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 339, 2005 WL 90987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-longoria-texapp-2005.