In Re Longhorn Merit, LLC v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00771-CV
IN RE LONGHORN MERIT, LLC, et al.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
Opinion by: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 4, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus on December 1, 2025, seeking an order
directing the respondent to vacate its order granting a new trial and to render judgment on a jury’s
verdict. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relators can show (1) the
trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no
adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.
proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators have not
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 22-09-15018-ZCV, styled Emily Heuerman, Individually in Her Capacity as Co-Trustee of the Testamentary Trust Created by Meade Winterbotham Eastham a/k/a The Meade Winterbotham Eastham Testamentary Trust, et. al. vs Longhorn Merit, LLC, et. al., pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas, the Honorable Maribel Flores presiding. 04-25-00771-CV
established their entitlement to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus
is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Longhorn Merit, LLC v. the State of Texas (In Re Longhorn Merit, LLC v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.