In re Long

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In re Long

755 A.2d 842, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 149, 2000 WL 1021187

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 26, 2000

DocketNo. 2000-270-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 755 A.2d 842 (In re Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Long, 755 A.2d 842, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 149, 2000 WL 1021187 (R.I. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The respondent is a member of the Bar of this State. On May 12, 2000, the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law in the courts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for a period of three (3) months. On May 22, 2000 this Court’s Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition requesting the respondent to inform us of any claim by him that the imposition of identical discipline by this Court would be unwarranted. On June 22, 2000, the respondent appeared before us at our conference. After hearing respondent, we are of the opinion that reciprocal discipline should be imposed pursuant to Article III Rule 14(d).

Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondent, Christopher F. Long, be and he hereby immediately is suspended from the practice of law in this State for a period of three months.

A full opinion by this Court will follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The respondent is a member of the Bar of this State. On May 12, 2000, the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law in the courts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for a period of three (3) months. On May 22, 2000 this Court’s Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition requesting the respondent to inform us of any claim by him that the imposition of identical discipline by this Court would be unwarranted. On June 22, 2000, the respondent appeared before us at our conference. After hearing respondent, we are of the opinion that reciprocal discipline should be imposed pursuant to Article III Rule 14(d).

Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondent, Christopher F. Long, be and he hereby immediately is suspended from the practice of law in this State for a period of three months.

A full opinion by this Court will follow.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 A.2d 842, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 149, 2000 WL 1021187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-long-ri-2000.