In re Long

84 A. 1030, 26 Del. 447, 3 Boyce 447, 1912 Del. LEXIS 56
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided October 10, 1912·No. No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Boyce, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

We are clearly of the opinion that it does not sufficiently appear that both the house and lot of ground were advertised for sale.

The advertisement is confined to a description and the location of the house.

Upon this announcement, counsel against the rule requested that the sale be set aside.

Boyce, J.:

The rule is made absolute, and the sale is set, aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Long, 84 A. 1030, 26 Del. 447, 3 Boyce 447, 1912 Del. LEXIS 56 (Del. Ct. App. 1912).

84 A. 1030 (In re Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Seaford Hardware Co.
132 A. 737 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1926)