In re Lockwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Lockwood

915 N.W.2d 6

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 12, 2018

DocketA18-0951

StatusPublished

This text of 915 N.W.2d 6 (In re Lockwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lockwood, 915 N.W.2d 6 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Mary Elizabeth Lockwood has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline-namely, failing to safeguard clients' funds, failing to timely refund to a client funds advanced for an expense that was not incurred, negligently misappropriating a client's funds, and failing to provide receipts signed by a payor for cash payments. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 1.15(c)(4), 1.15(h), as interpreted by Appendix 1 thereto, 1.16(d).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), waives her right to answer the petition, and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition. The parties recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 6 months.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended discipline.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Mary Elizabeth Lockwood is suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 6 months.

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility, see Rule 18(e)(2), RLPR, and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements, see Rule 18(e)(4), RLPR.

3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

David L. Lillehaug

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Mary Elizabeth Lockwood has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline-namely, failing to safeguard clients' funds, failing to timely refund to a client funds advanced for an expense that was not incurred, negligently misappropriating a client's funds, and failing to provide receipts signed by a payor for cash payments. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 1.15(c)(4), 1.15(h), as interpreted by Appendix 1 thereto, 1.16(d).