In re Lockard

808 A.2d 95, 174 N.J. 373, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1470
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 808 A.2d 95 (In re Lockard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lockard, 808 A.2d 95, 174 N.J. 373, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1470 (N.J. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-062, recommending that DAVID L. LOCK-ARD of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA be barred permanently from appearing pro hoc vice in this State;

And DAVID L. LOCKARD having been ordered to show cause why he should not be so barred or why the Court should not take other appropriate action;

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that there is clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to safeguard client funds, in violation of RPC 1.15(c);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the privilege of DAVID L. LOCKARD to appear pro hac vice in New Jersey pursuant to Rule 1:21-2 is hereby suspended for a period of three years and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 A.2d 95, 174 N.J. 373, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lockard-nj-2002.