In Re Lmf

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Lmf

357 S.W.3d 288, 2012 WL 216349

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 2012

DocketED 96723

StatusPublished

This text of 357 S.W.3d 288 (In Re Lmf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Lmf, 357 S.W.3d 288, 2012 WL 216349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

357 S.W.3d 288 (2012)

In the Interest of: L.M.F.

No. ED 96723.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

January 24, 2012.

Christopher M. Braeske, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jennifer R. Piper, St. Louis, MO, Juvenile.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gary L. Garner, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Allison Wolff, Clayton, MO, Juvenile Officer.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A.G. appeals from the order and judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to L.M.F. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI