In re Lloyd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Lloyd

190 A.3d 442, 234 N.J. 264

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 30, 2018·No. M-1501 September Term 2017; 081519·Published

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by JAMES DAVID LLOYD of **265MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since March 23, 2016;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JAMES DAVID LLOYD is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by JAMES DAVID LLOYD of **265MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since March 23, 2016;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JAMES DAVID LLOYD is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

In re Lloyd, 190 A.3d 442, 234 N.J. 264 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

190 A.3d 442 (In re Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.