In re Lloyd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Lloyd

190 A.3d 442, 234 N.J. 264

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJuly 30, 2018

DocketM-1501 September Term 2017; 081519

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.3d 442 (In re Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lloyd, 190 A.3d 442, 234 N.J. 264 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by JAMES DAVID LLOYD of **265MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since March 23, 2016;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JAMES DAVID LLOYD is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by JAMES DAVID LLOYD of **265MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since March 23, 2016;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JAMES DAVID LLOYD is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.3d 442, 234 N.J. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lloyd-nj-2018.