In re Llonnie D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Llonnie D.

50 A.D.3d 468, 857 N.Y.S.2d 518

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.3d 468 (In re Llonnie D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Llonnie D., 50 A.D.3d 468, 857 N.Y.S.2d 518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about May 15, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and [469]*469imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s request for a dismissal or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, and instead adjudicating him a juvenile delinquent and imposing a conditional discharge (see e.g. Matter of Jonaivy Q., 286 AD2d 645 [2001]), in light of the fact that, after stealing property, appellant refused to obey the lawful command of a police officer to stop and fled, resulting in a serious injury to the officer. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about May 15, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and [469]*469imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s request for a dismissal or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, and instead adjudicating him a juvenile delinquent and imposing a conditional discharge (see e.g. Matter of Jonaivy Q., 286 AD2d 645 [2001]), in light of the fact that, after stealing property, appellant refused to obey the lawful command of a police officer to stop and fled, resulting in a serious injury to the officer. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.3d 468, 857 N.Y.S.2d 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-llonnie-d-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack