In re Lloida W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lloida W.

18 A.D.3d 665, 795 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 665 (In re Lloida W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lloida W., 18 A.D.3d 665, 795 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated March 29, 2004, which denied her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue her prior motion to vacate an order of fact-finding and disposition of the same court (Knipps, J.), dated March 22, 2002, which, after fact-finding and [666]*666dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and Brookwood Child Care for the purpose of adoption, which had been denied in a prior order of the same court (Turbow, J.), dated February 17, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Matter of Young v Young, 281 AD2d 486 [2001]; Frisenda v X Large Enters., 280 AD2d 514 [2001]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated March 29, 2004, which denied her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue her prior motion to vacate an order of fact-finding and disposition of the same court (Knipps, J.), dated March 22, 2002, which, after fact-finding and [666]*666dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and Brookwood Child Care for the purpose of adoption, which had been denied in a prior order of the same court (Turbow, J.), dated February 17, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Matter of Young v Young, 281 AD2d 486 [2001]; Frisenda v X Large Enters., 280 AD2d 514 [2001]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 665, 795 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lloida-w-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack