In Re Ll
This text of 282 S.W.3d 398 (In Re Ll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Interest of: L.L. and R.D.,
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
v.
L.L. (Father), Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Kathleen Winger, Harrisonville, MO, for Respondent.
John A. Lozano, Harrisonville, MO, for Appellant.
Before LISA WHITE HARDWICK, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
L.L. appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his children, R.D. and L.L. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Juvenile Officer did not present clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support termination upon any statutory ground. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 S.W.3d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ll-moctapp-2009.