in Re: Liza Wildman

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 8, 2019
• Docket: 05-19-00518-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed May 8, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00518-CV

IN RE LIZA WILDMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-02529-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Schenck In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s April 9, 2019 order

denying relator’s motion to compel and request for entry of a scheduling order. To be entitled to

mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and

that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36

(Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown

she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines

relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/David J. Schenck/ 190518F.P05 DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE