In re Livingston

2 Denio 575
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Senators Lott and Porter

delivered written opinions in favor of affirming the order of the chancellor. In addition to the authorities referred to in the opinion of the chancellor, they cited and commented upon the following: Bointhon v. Hockmore, (1 Vern. 316;) Scattergood v. Harrison, (Moseley's R. 128;) Robinson v. Pett, (3 P. Wms. 249;) In Re Ormsby, (1 Ball & Bea. 189;) Brocksopp v. Barnes, (5 Madd. 90.)

Senators Folsom and Putnam delivered written opinions in favor of reversing the order appealed from. .

On the question being put, “ Shall this, decree be reversed 1” the members of the court voted as follows :

For reversal: Senators Emmons, Folsom, Jones and Putnam—4.

[577]*577For affirmance; The President, Mr. Justice Jewett, and Senators Backus, Barlow, Bockee, Deyo, Hand, Johnson Lott, Porter, Scovil, Smith and Talcott—13.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Livingston, 2 Denio 575 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

2 Denio 575 (In re Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Cochrane
2 Connoly 418 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1890)
In re Smith's Estate
12 N.Y.S. 88 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1890)
Parsee Merchant's Case
11 Abb. Pr. 209 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)
In re Colah
3 Daly 529 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)
Aufricht v. Northrup
20 Iowa 61 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1865)
Willcox v. Smith
26 Barb. 316 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)